What is the name of the exception that allows evidence to be admitted if it would have been discovered anyway?

Study for the DSST Criminal Justice Exam. Get access to flashcards and multiple-choice questions with hints and explanations. Enhance your understanding and get ready to ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

What is the name of the exception that allows evidence to be admitted if it would have been discovered anyway?

Explanation:
The inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule is the idea here. Under the exclusionary rule, evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is generally barred to deter unlawful police conduct. But there’s an exception: if the same evidence would have been discovered through lawful means anyway, the evidence can be admitted. The rationale is that the outcome would have occurred regardless of the illegal action, so excluding it would not further deter bad behavior. A classic illustration is when investigators would have found the evidence during a legitimate search or through an independent line of investigation that would have led to the same discovery. This is distinguished from the general exclusionary rule and from the broader fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, which covers evidence derived from illegality unless an exception applies. It also isn’t about searches incident to arrest, which is a separate doctrine.

The inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule is the idea here. Under the exclusionary rule, evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is generally barred to deter unlawful police conduct. But there’s an exception: if the same evidence would have been discovered through lawful means anyway, the evidence can be admitted. The rationale is that the outcome would have occurred regardless of the illegal action, so excluding it would not further deter bad behavior.

A classic illustration is when investigators would have found the evidence during a legitimate search or through an independent line of investigation that would have led to the same discovery. This is distinguished from the general exclusionary rule and from the broader fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, which covers evidence derived from illegality unless an exception applies. It also isn’t about searches incident to arrest, which is a separate doctrine.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy